I've read the book, and the movie's not so bad. Obviously there are many things I'd do different, but in the end it's 2,5 hours of good entertainment, and isn't that what the ratings are all about? Personally I think Tom Hanks wasn't passionate enough for Robert Langdon. That's why it's not a 9 for me.A lot of people are too harsh on this one. Mostly because they know the book and have very high expectations. I have to see my first book-to-film where the film is better.Also, you're not going to hell for watching this movie or reading the book. It's based on a novel, which is based on a few loose theories, but in the end all it wants to do is to entertain. And that is exactly what both the book and the movie did for me.
'Sentiment: Positive 🙂'
This movie is honestly gold. I'm speechless, the plot twists have me everytime!
'Sentiment: Positive 🙂'
CAN WE PUT TO BED 'THE BOOK WAS BETTER'.The book is always better because you fill in the blanks with your own imagination!!!You all need to let go of this ridiculous measure for rating a film.The story in this case is pretty good, the acting is mostly ok and its sets up an effective atmosphere filled with mystique.Its a good film.